562 lines
18 KiB
Python
562 lines
18 KiB
Python
|
# Natural Language Toolkit: Nonmonotonic Reasoning
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# Author: Daniel H. Garrette <dhgarrette@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2001-2023 NLTK Project
|
||
|
|
# URL: <https://www.nltk.org/>
|
||
|
|
# For license information, see LICENSE.TXT
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
A module to perform nonmonotonic reasoning. The ideas and demonstrations in
|
||
|
|
this module are based on "Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence" by
|
||
|
|
Michael R. Genesereth and Nils J. Nilsson.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
from collections import defaultdict
|
||
|
|
from functools import reduce
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
from nltk.inference.api import Prover, ProverCommandDecorator
|
||
|
|
from nltk.inference.prover9 import Prover9, Prover9Command
|
||
|
|
from nltk.sem.logic import (
|
||
|
|
AbstractVariableExpression,
|
||
|
|
AllExpression,
|
||
|
|
AndExpression,
|
||
|
|
ApplicationExpression,
|
||
|
|
BooleanExpression,
|
||
|
|
EqualityExpression,
|
||
|
|
ExistsExpression,
|
||
|
|
Expression,
|
||
|
|
ImpExpression,
|
||
|
|
NegatedExpression,
|
||
|
|
Variable,
|
||
|
|
VariableExpression,
|
||
|
|
operator,
|
||
|
|
unique_variable,
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class ProverParseError(Exception):
|
||
|
|
pass
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def get_domain(goal, assumptions):
|
||
|
|
if goal is None:
|
||
|
|
all_expressions = assumptions
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
all_expressions = assumptions + [-goal]
|
||
|
|
return reduce(operator.or_, (a.constants() for a in all_expressions), set())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class ClosedDomainProver(ProverCommandDecorator):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
This is a prover decorator that adds domain closure assumptions before
|
||
|
|
proving.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def assumptions(self):
|
||
|
|
assumptions = [a for a in self._command.assumptions()]
|
||
|
|
goal = self._command.goal()
|
||
|
|
domain = get_domain(goal, assumptions)
|
||
|
|
return [self.replace_quants(ex, domain) for ex in assumptions]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def goal(self):
|
||
|
|
goal = self._command.goal()
|
||
|
|
domain = get_domain(goal, self._command.assumptions())
|
||
|
|
return self.replace_quants(goal, domain)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def replace_quants(self, ex, domain):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
Apply the closed domain assumption to the expression
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Domain = union([e.free()|e.constants() for e in all_expressions])
|
||
|
|
- translate "exists x.P" to "(z=d1 | z=d2 | ... ) & P.replace(x,z)" OR
|
||
|
|
"P.replace(x, d1) | P.replace(x, d2) | ..."
|
||
|
|
- translate "all x.P" to "P.replace(x, d1) & P.replace(x, d2) & ..."
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
:param ex: ``Expression``
|
||
|
|
:param domain: set of {Variable}s
|
||
|
|
:return: ``Expression``
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
if isinstance(ex, AllExpression):
|
||
|
|
conjuncts = [
|
||
|
|
ex.term.replace(ex.variable, VariableExpression(d)) for d in domain
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
conjuncts = [self.replace_quants(c, domain) for c in conjuncts]
|
||
|
|
return reduce(lambda x, y: x & y, conjuncts)
|
||
|
|
elif isinstance(ex, BooleanExpression):
|
||
|
|
return ex.__class__(
|
||
|
|
self.replace_quants(ex.first, domain),
|
||
|
|
self.replace_quants(ex.second, domain),
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
elif isinstance(ex, NegatedExpression):
|
||
|
|
return -self.replace_quants(ex.term, domain)
|
||
|
|
elif isinstance(ex, ExistsExpression):
|
||
|
|
disjuncts = [
|
||
|
|
ex.term.replace(ex.variable, VariableExpression(d)) for d in domain
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
disjuncts = [self.replace_quants(d, domain) for d in disjuncts]
|
||
|
|
return reduce(lambda x, y: x | y, disjuncts)
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
return ex
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class UniqueNamesProver(ProverCommandDecorator):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
This is a prover decorator that adds unique names assumptions before
|
||
|
|
proving.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def assumptions(self):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
- Domain = union([e.free()|e.constants() for e in all_expressions])
|
||
|
|
- if "d1 = d2" cannot be proven from the premises, then add "d1 != d2"
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
assumptions = self._command.assumptions()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
domain = list(get_domain(self._command.goal(), assumptions))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# build a dictionary of obvious equalities
|
||
|
|
eq_sets = SetHolder()
|
||
|
|
for a in assumptions:
|
||
|
|
if isinstance(a, EqualityExpression):
|
||
|
|
av = a.first.variable
|
||
|
|
bv = a.second.variable
|
||
|
|
# put 'a' and 'b' in the same set
|
||
|
|
eq_sets[av].add(bv)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
new_assumptions = []
|
||
|
|
for i, a in enumerate(domain):
|
||
|
|
for b in domain[i + 1 :]:
|
||
|
|
# if a and b are not already in the same equality set
|
||
|
|
if b not in eq_sets[a]:
|
||
|
|
newEqEx = EqualityExpression(
|
||
|
|
VariableExpression(a), VariableExpression(b)
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
if Prover9().prove(newEqEx, assumptions):
|
||
|
|
# we can prove that the names are the same entity.
|
||
|
|
# remember that they are equal so we don't re-check.
|
||
|
|
eq_sets[a].add(b)
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
# we can't prove it, so assume unique names
|
||
|
|
new_assumptions.append(-newEqEx)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return assumptions + new_assumptions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class SetHolder(list):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
A list of sets of Variables.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def __getitem__(self, item):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
:param item: ``Variable``
|
||
|
|
:return: the set containing 'item'
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
assert isinstance(item, Variable)
|
||
|
|
for s in self:
|
||
|
|
if item in s:
|
||
|
|
return s
|
||
|
|
# item is not found in any existing set. so create a new set
|
||
|
|
new = {item}
|
||
|
|
self.append(new)
|
||
|
|
return new
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class ClosedWorldProver(ProverCommandDecorator):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
This is a prover decorator that completes predicates before proving.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the assumptions contain "P(A)", then "all x.(P(x) -> (x=A))" is the completion of "P".
|
||
|
|
If the assumptions contain "all x.(ostrich(x) -> bird(x))", then "all x.(bird(x) -> ostrich(x))" is the completion of "bird".
|
||
|
|
If the assumptions don't contain anything that are "P", then "all x.-P(x)" is the completion of "P".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
walk(Socrates)
|
||
|
|
Socrates != Bill
|
||
|
|
+ all x.(walk(x) -> (x=Socrates))
|
||
|
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
-walk(Bill)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
see(Socrates, John)
|
||
|
|
see(John, Mary)
|
||
|
|
Socrates != John
|
||
|
|
John != Mary
|
||
|
|
+ all x.all y.(see(x,y) -> ((x=Socrates & y=John) | (x=John & y=Mary)))
|
||
|
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
-see(Socrates, Mary)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
all x.(ostrich(x) -> bird(x))
|
||
|
|
bird(Tweety)
|
||
|
|
-ostrich(Sam)
|
||
|
|
Sam != Tweety
|
||
|
|
+ all x.(bird(x) -> (ostrich(x) | x=Tweety))
|
||
|
|
+ all x.-ostrich(x)
|
||
|
|
-------------------
|
||
|
|
-bird(Sam)
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def assumptions(self):
|
||
|
|
assumptions = self._command.assumptions()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
predicates = self._make_predicate_dict(assumptions)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
new_assumptions = []
|
||
|
|
for p in predicates:
|
||
|
|
predHolder = predicates[p]
|
||
|
|
new_sig = self._make_unique_signature(predHolder)
|
||
|
|
new_sig_exs = [VariableExpression(v) for v in new_sig]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
disjuncts = []
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Turn the signatures into disjuncts
|
||
|
|
for sig in predHolder.signatures:
|
||
|
|
equality_exs = []
|
||
|
|
for v1, v2 in zip(new_sig_exs, sig):
|
||
|
|
equality_exs.append(EqualityExpression(v1, v2))
|
||
|
|
disjuncts.append(reduce(lambda x, y: x & y, equality_exs))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Turn the properties into disjuncts
|
||
|
|
for prop in predHolder.properties:
|
||
|
|
# replace variables from the signature with new sig variables
|
||
|
|
bindings = {}
|
||
|
|
for v1, v2 in zip(new_sig_exs, prop[0]):
|
||
|
|
bindings[v2] = v1
|
||
|
|
disjuncts.append(prop[1].substitute_bindings(bindings))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# make the assumption
|
||
|
|
if disjuncts:
|
||
|
|
# disjuncts exist, so make an implication
|
||
|
|
antecedent = self._make_antecedent(p, new_sig)
|
||
|
|
consequent = reduce(lambda x, y: x | y, disjuncts)
|
||
|
|
accum = ImpExpression(antecedent, consequent)
|
||
|
|
else:
|
||
|
|
# nothing has property 'p'
|
||
|
|
accum = NegatedExpression(self._make_antecedent(p, new_sig))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# quantify the implication
|
||
|
|
for new_sig_var in new_sig[::-1]:
|
||
|
|
accum = AllExpression(new_sig_var, accum)
|
||
|
|
new_assumptions.append(accum)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
return assumptions + new_assumptions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def _make_unique_signature(self, predHolder):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
This method figures out how many arguments the predicate takes and
|
||
|
|
returns a tuple containing that number of unique variables.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
return tuple(unique_variable() for i in range(predHolder.signature_len))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def _make_antecedent(self, predicate, signature):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
Return an application expression with 'predicate' as the predicate
|
||
|
|
and 'signature' as the list of arguments.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
antecedent = predicate
|
||
|
|
for v in signature:
|
||
|
|
antecedent = antecedent(VariableExpression(v))
|
||
|
|
return antecedent
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def _make_predicate_dict(self, assumptions):
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
Create a dictionary of predicates from the assumptions.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
:param assumptions: a list of ``Expression``s
|
||
|
|
:return: dict mapping ``AbstractVariableExpression`` to ``PredHolder``
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
predicates = defaultdict(PredHolder)
|
||
|
|
for a in assumptions:
|
||
|
|
self._map_predicates(a, predicates)
|
||
|
|
return predicates
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def _map_predicates(self, expression, predDict):
|
||
|
|
if isinstance(expression, ApplicationExpression):
|
||
|
|
func, args = expression.uncurry()
|
||
|
|
if isinstance(func, AbstractVariableExpression):
|
||
|
|
predDict[func].append_sig(tuple(args))
|
||
|
|
elif isinstance(expression, AndExpression):
|
||
|
|
self._map_predicates(expression.first, predDict)
|
||
|
|
self._map_predicates(expression.second, predDict)
|
||
|
|
elif isinstance(expression, AllExpression):
|
||
|
|
# collect all the universally quantified variables
|
||
|
|
sig = [expression.variable]
|
||
|
|
term = expression.term
|
||
|
|
while isinstance(term, AllExpression):
|
||
|
|
sig.append(term.variable)
|
||
|
|
term = term.term
|
||
|
|
if isinstance(term, ImpExpression):
|
||
|
|
if isinstance(term.first, ApplicationExpression) and isinstance(
|
||
|
|
term.second, ApplicationExpression
|
||
|
|
):
|
||
|
|
func1, args1 = term.first.uncurry()
|
||
|
|
func2, args2 = term.second.uncurry()
|
||
|
|
if (
|
||
|
|
isinstance(func1, AbstractVariableExpression)
|
||
|
|
and isinstance(func2, AbstractVariableExpression)
|
||
|
|
and sig == [v.variable for v in args1]
|
||
|
|
and sig == [v.variable for v in args2]
|
||
|
|
):
|
||
|
|
predDict[func2].append_prop((tuple(sig), term.first))
|
||
|
|
predDict[func1].validate_sig_len(sig)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class PredHolder:
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
This class will be used by a dictionary that will store information
|
||
|
|
about predicates to be used by the ``ClosedWorldProver``.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The 'signatures' property is a list of tuples defining signatures for
|
||
|
|
which the predicate is true. For instance, 'see(john, mary)' would be
|
||
|
|
result in the signature '(john,mary)' for 'see'.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The second element of the pair is a list of pairs such that the first
|
||
|
|
element of the pair is a tuple of variables and the second element is an
|
||
|
|
expression of those variables that makes the predicate true. For instance,
|
||
|
|
'all x.all y.(see(x,y) -> know(x,y))' would result in "((x,y),('see(x,y)'))"
|
||
|
|
for 'know'.
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
||
|
|
self.signatures = []
|
||
|
|
self.properties = []
|
||
|
|
self.signature_len = None
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def append_sig(self, new_sig):
|
||
|
|
self.validate_sig_len(new_sig)
|
||
|
|
self.signatures.append(new_sig)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def append_prop(self, new_prop):
|
||
|
|
self.validate_sig_len(new_prop[0])
|
||
|
|
self.properties.append(new_prop)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def validate_sig_len(self, new_sig):
|
||
|
|
if self.signature_len is None:
|
||
|
|
self.signature_len = len(new_sig)
|
||
|
|
elif self.signature_len != len(new_sig):
|
||
|
|
raise Exception("Signature lengths do not match")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def __str__(self):
|
||
|
|
return f"({self.signatures},{self.properties},{self.signature_len})"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def __repr__(self):
|
||
|
|
return "%s" % self
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def closed_domain_demo():
|
||
|
|
lexpr = Expression.fromstring
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"exists x.walk(x)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"man(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"walk(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cdp = ClosedDomainProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cdp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cdp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cdp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"exists x.walk(x)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"man(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
p3 = lexpr(r"-walk(Bill)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"walk(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2, p3])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cdp = ClosedDomainProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cdp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cdp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cdp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"exists x.walk(x)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"man(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
p3 = lexpr(r"-walk(Bill)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"walk(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2, p3])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cdp = ClosedDomainProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cdp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cdp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cdp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"walk(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"walk(Bill)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"all x.walk(x)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cdp = ClosedDomainProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cdp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cdp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cdp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"girl(mary)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"dog(rover)")
|
||
|
|
p3 = lexpr(r"all x.(girl(x) -> -dog(x))")
|
||
|
|
p4 = lexpr(r"all x.(dog(x) -> -girl(x))")
|
||
|
|
p5 = lexpr(r"chase(mary, rover)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"exists y.(dog(y) & all x.(girl(x) -> chase(x,y)))")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2, p3, p4, p5])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cdp = ClosedDomainProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cdp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cdp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cdp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def unique_names_demo():
|
||
|
|
lexpr = Expression.fromstring
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"man(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"man(Bill)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"exists x.exists y.(x != y)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
unp = UniqueNamesProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in unp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", unp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(unp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"all x.(walk(x) -> (x = Socrates))")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"Bill = William")
|
||
|
|
p3 = lexpr(r"Bill = Billy")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"-walk(William)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2, p3])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
unp = UniqueNamesProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in unp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", unp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(unp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def closed_world_demo():
|
||
|
|
lexpr = Expression.fromstring
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"walk(Socrates)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"(Socrates != Bill)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"-walk(Bill)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cwp = ClosedWorldProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cwp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cwp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cwp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"see(Socrates, John)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"see(John, Mary)")
|
||
|
|
p3 = lexpr(r"(Socrates != John)")
|
||
|
|
p4 = lexpr(r"(John != Mary)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"-see(Socrates, Mary)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2, p3, p4])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cwp = ClosedWorldProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cwp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cwp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cwp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"all x.(ostrich(x) -> bird(x))")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"bird(Tweety)")
|
||
|
|
p3 = lexpr(r"-ostrich(Sam)")
|
||
|
|
p4 = lexpr(r"Sam != Tweety")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"-bird(Sam)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2, p3, p4])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
cwp = ClosedWorldProver(prover)
|
||
|
|
print("assumptions:")
|
||
|
|
for a in cwp.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(" ", a)
|
||
|
|
print("goal:", cwp.goal())
|
||
|
|
print(cwp.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def combination_prover_demo():
|
||
|
|
lexpr = Expression.fromstring
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
p1 = lexpr(r"see(Socrates, John)")
|
||
|
|
p2 = lexpr(r"see(John, Mary)")
|
||
|
|
c = lexpr(r"-see(Socrates, Mary)")
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(c, [p1, p2])
|
||
|
|
print(prover.prove())
|
||
|
|
command = ClosedDomainProver(UniqueNamesProver(ClosedWorldProver(prover)))
|
||
|
|
for a in command.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(a)
|
||
|
|
print(command.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def default_reasoning_demo():
|
||
|
|
lexpr = Expression.fromstring
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
premises = []
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# define taxonomy
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(elephant(x) -> animal(x))"))
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(bird(x) -> animal(x))"))
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(dove(x) -> bird(x))"))
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(ostrich(x) -> bird(x))"))
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(flying_ostrich(x) -> ostrich(x))"))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# default properties
|
||
|
|
premises.append(
|
||
|
|
lexpr(r"all x.((animal(x) & -Ab1(x)) -> -fly(x))")
|
||
|
|
) # normal animals don't fly
|
||
|
|
premises.append(
|
||
|
|
lexpr(r"all x.((bird(x) & -Ab2(x)) -> fly(x))")
|
||
|
|
) # normal birds fly
|
||
|
|
premises.append(
|
||
|
|
lexpr(r"all x.((ostrich(x) & -Ab3(x)) -> -fly(x))")
|
||
|
|
) # normal ostriches don't fly
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# specify abnormal entities
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(bird(x) -> Ab1(x))")) # flight
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(ostrich(x) -> Ab2(x))")) # non-flying bird
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"all x.(flying_ostrich(x) -> Ab3(x))")) # flying ostrich
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# define entities
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"elephant(E)"))
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"dove(D)"))
|
||
|
|
premises.append(lexpr(r"ostrich(O)"))
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# print the assumptions
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(None, premises)
|
||
|
|
command = UniqueNamesProver(ClosedWorldProver(prover))
|
||
|
|
for a in command.assumptions():
|
||
|
|
print(a)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
print_proof("-fly(E)", premises)
|
||
|
|
print_proof("fly(D)", premises)
|
||
|
|
print_proof("-fly(O)", premises)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def print_proof(goal, premises):
|
||
|
|
lexpr = Expression.fromstring
|
||
|
|
prover = Prover9Command(lexpr(goal), premises)
|
||
|
|
command = UniqueNamesProver(ClosedWorldProver(prover))
|
||
|
|
print(goal, prover.prove(), command.prove())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def demo():
|
||
|
|
closed_domain_demo()
|
||
|
|
unique_names_demo()
|
||
|
|
closed_world_demo()
|
||
|
|
combination_prover_demo()
|
||
|
|
default_reasoning_demo()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||
|
|
demo()
|